Pope Benedict XVI
Pope Benedict XVI totally looks like Darth Sidious from Star Wars
Submitted by Mandee S
Create Your Look-Alikes: Combine two photos (the famous face and the look-alike) on our Look-Alike Builder. The look-alike can be anything, from other faces to animals and objects. We have no mercy... :)
« Previous Joe Satriani | Posh Spice Next »
thats a match and both belive in god and eavil sides
they both evil man
Yes, & they both belong to the Dark Side!!!
Which one is more evil, though? The one who admits he is evil or the one who deludes himself and his followers? I’d follow the one who was honest with me at all cost before I’d follow a liar. However, I think the pope dresses better–and all at the cost of his followers!
remeber that darth sidious once pretended to be god but since he later admitet to be dark I most ray he i´s the most honest one.
learn to spell; simple words like “good” really make a difference. Admitted, must, say, is…
Seriously?
Learn to capitalize the first letter of the first word of your sentence.
yeah hilarious
couldnt look more alike if they tried
Well, I have always supported the Empire in most matters.
terrible. funny, but terrible
boy, did you hit the nail……………….
That’s the Emperor, not Darth Sidious.
Actually it’s both… didn’t you watch the first three movies?
Phee - let me tell you about a little search engine called Google. Even Wikipedia acknowledges they are the same…
Yes, I watched the movies… but That Picture is of the Emperor.
Emperor Palpatine is to Darth Sidious as Anakin Skywalker is to Darth Vader. One and the same. The picture is of Emeror Palpatine and Darth Sidious. Are you starting to see a pattern here?
That’s not 100% accurate. Palpatine/Sidious are truly one in the same, and the two names remain interchangable throughout his life. Anakin/Vader while they are technically the same person, there is a point where he stops being Anakin and becomes Vader (And goes back to Anakin-hood 30 seconds before dying)
But what Capt O says is basically the truth. However I think what they mean when they say it’s the emperor not sidious is that the pic was taken from the original movies when he was only known as the emperor.
Well, I suppose with that logic, you could say that Emperor Palapatine wasn’t always the Emperor, before that he was a Senator and probably at one point a young child.
He also wasn’t always a Sith Lord, unless he was born one.
Ok, Eddy has a good point, so a slight revision. While the names Palpatine and Sidious aren’t interchangable through his entire life, he did go by both names for a time.
Or I’ll just argue that he was born a sith lord and chellenge you to prove me wrong
(PS I know that’s not the case, don’t bother proving me wrong.)
Palpatine is Darth Sidious all the time he is the emperor,
thus the names are interchangeable.
But concerning this picture to be of the earlier episodes
(IV-VI) as far as i would assume, Palaptine was called
The Emperor and thus should’ve been in the picture.
That was exactly my point, Kurt and Walli, thanks for getting it. Some people would rather insult and be nasty.
No problem. As the Star-Wars geek i am, it was not
that hard to figure it out…
Nothing makes the milk squirt out my nose faster than a nerd fight. Thanks!
are you really that stupid??
are you really that stupid eddy?
Humour comprehension… FAIL!
Darth Sidious is the Emperor
they both preside over a religion…
Now the question is, Can Pope Benedict XVI fire lighting out of his hands?
last time I checked, he could not.
Yet.
lol, epic win kit
Have you ever challenged him in battle? I thought not.
nobody survived the duells.
when I was chasing pidgeons in the Vatican, nobody shot lightning at ME
Well, that stands to reason.
Pigeons are the spawn of demons and all.
Huh? That made NO sense whatsoever…
And the other question is does Sidious condone the molestation of padawans?
Clearly, he condones the slaughtering of younglings, and I suppose beheading is a form of molestation.
“Be felt up by the force young one”
“Lighting.” Gee, wouldn’t that be something. We’d never have need of a flashlight again.
Lightening. Real lightening.
So which one’s the worse bad guy….hmmmm?
you should probably watch what you say. Just because you *probably* aren’t Catholic, doesn’t make the Pope a “bad guy.”
We can say whatever we want to say.
Rubber baby buggy bumpers. Rubber baby buggy bumpers. Rubber baby buggy bumpers. I guess you’re right. I can say what ever I want.
you’re right. you can say whatever you want to say. that doesn’t make you right, or even very smart.
Idiot
kind of like insulting people on a message board for having an opinion? Welcome to freedom of the press and freedom of speech. And welcome to having a sense of humor
THE POPE POOPS!!!!
alot
Often, thanks to Metamucil.
do you think he mixes it with holy water?
I didn’t know freedom of the press extended to message boards.
What do I know?
The pope, in most incarnations, is, in fact, a bad guy. Especially when he tells his cardinals and priests to say nothing about molestations until the statute of limitations is over.
What an a**hole.
That never happened.
Except for the reestablished declaration of the primacy of the roman catholic brand of insanity, essentially stating that all non catholics would a. Burn in hell for all eternity, or b. Be stuck in purgatory for all eternity.
Ya know, I’d say that the mark of an arrogant, pompous, and evil man.
HOWEVER
He did declare “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached” And while this statement is true, and spreading faith by the sword is a very bad thing, the hypocritical nature of criticizing how one religion spreads its faith versus the good old standard burning that catholic inquisitors used to weed out the unfaithful is astounding.
Long story short, all religion is, basically, ridiculous, stating belief, SPECIFIC belief, in the unknowable, and evil for the violence used in the name of faith. Don’t even get me started on the Popes and the Nazis and similar regimes.
Religion does not deserve any respect. It is just another form of dangerous delusion, and people should be able to speak out against it without being labeled as bigots.
“Don’t even get me started on the Popes and the Nazis and similar regimes.” You mean like the fact that the Pope actively opposed the Nazis, or the lie that says the opposite.
Since you’re spreading bigoted lies, what have you to complain of?
It is pretty tough to not recognize the primacy of Peter in the New Testament. Since Peter instituted the line of the Popes in Rome (not to be confused with the Pope in Alexandria), I don’t know where people say that the Church has no need for Popes. The Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have been working hard to bring about communion in the Church (although there is only one Church). As Jesus had one body, so His Mystical Body is also whole. Primacy of the Pope is a stumbling block for communion in the Church, but the Holy Spirit will heal this division.
As for bashing the Church as a negative influence, I recommend you look at the work of Tom Woods in this regards, especially his work in, “How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization,” and, “The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy.”
http://www.thomasewoods.com/
And I’m certain equally many works of equally respectable scholars could be taken to task for the opposite view. Certainly, his argument that the Catholic worldview did not hamper scientific progress because Jehovah’s laws were discoverable by humans, ignores both the fact that the very same was true in ancient Greece, where scholars e.g. not only managed to calculate quite accurately the distance between the Earth and the Sun and the Earth and the Moon, but also realized that the Earth was, in fact, round, and orbited the Sun, not the other way around. Catholic dogma has, of course, been very helpful for discovering the basic facts of nature when, and only when, those basic facts of nature were not counterindicated in the Bible. But when they were - such as the aforementioned facts of kindergarten-level astronomy - the Catholic church in fact were a great impediment to scientific progress. Of course modern culture and society builds heavily upon catholicism. Just like modern Japanese culture still builds heavily on Buddhism, Shinto and Taoism. It was unavoidable; Christianity has been the dominant religion in the occident since the decline of the Roman Empire. However, most of the things considered good and desirable in modern society - democracy, equality, free economy, science, freethought and ingenuity in engineering - in fact were not invented by Christians, or even preserved by them. They came from Rome, Athens and Babylonia. While those writings deemed dogmatically pure were indeed preserved by the Catholic church, most of the writings we today possess from antiquity were either discovered by accident after the Dark Ages, or preserved by the Middle Eastern imperia before those venerable realms collapsed into barbarism.
It is pretty tough to not recognize the primacy of Peter in the New Testament. Since Peter instituted the line of the Popes in Rome (not to be confused with the Pope in Alexandria), I don’t know where people say that the Church has no need for Popes. The Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have been working hard to bring about communion in the Church (although there is only one Church). As Jesus had one body, so His Mystical Body is also whole. Primacy of the Pope is a stumbling block for communion in the Church, but the Holy Spirit will heal this division.
As for bashing the Church as a negative influence, I recommend you look at the work of Tom Woods in this regards, especially his work in, “How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization,” and, “The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy.”
well, just because you are a catholic doesn’t mean that he’s a good guy either… after all, the catholic church is a big business and owns a lot of land and real estate in many countries, and big car (and gun making) companies such as FIAT.
this coming from one that grew in the catholic tradition and who comes from a long line of catholics and respects all sorts of faiths, but that has the clarity of mind to see someone who is not a follower of what he claims to be. otherwise, he would actually do something for all the cases of child molestation. right?
anyways, i think at least the emperor was more open about his evil ways… the pope benedict is just creepy.
Since you haven’t been paying attention, you probably wouldn’t know that he has done a great deal to help those so abused and to see to it that it is as unlikely to happen as is humanly possible.