Funny Look-Alikes: Celebs, Famous People, Objects and Animals Matched With Their Long Lost Twins.

Create Your Look-Alikes: Combine two photos (the well-known and the look-alike) on our Look-Alike Builder. You can compare anything, from celebs to animals and objects.

 

« Previous | Next »

Nina Ricci Perfume Totally Looks Like Twilight Perfume



Nina Ricci Perfume Totally Looks Like Twilight Perfume

French Designer, Nina Ricci’s Perfume Totally Looks Like the Sarah Jessica Parker’s Twilight Perfume

picture: Nosela. lol caption: Noahtheallmighty

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 189 comments

  1. deezy says:

    somebody call the copyright office

    • Wickett55 says:

      It’s been done. I saw a news article weeks ago about it. The person that made this probably saw the same article and made this.

  2. Dani says:

    That’s not Sarah Jessica Parker’s perfume… thats TWILIGHT, merchandising of a movie

    [img]http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg19/greenconverses_photo/2i1jke8.png[/img]

    Look at http://www.stepheniemeyer.com/ ;)

  3. sevenmarie says:

    umm thats not sjp’s perfume its the twilight movie themed perfume (smells AWFUL!!!) also nina ricci is suing them over the design because hers came out 1st

    • Eddy says:

      FAIL that you even know that it smells terrible.

    • fubuki says:

      That movie stinks on a whole new level now.

      • crazyGirl says:

        i think maybe they should’ve hired some actors.
        my opinion is that would’ve made the movie better.
        only part i liked was taylor lautner who i think is muy hunky.

        • Rebecca says:

          I know, The girl who played bella was just terrible at acting

          • Annie Crimefighter's Subconscious says:

            Kristen Stewart has the cold, blank eyes of a shark. A dead shark. A dead shark with no personality. Or acting skill.

          • V.v.V says:

            Considering the book never says what Bella looks like (despite saying “Edward’s perfect face” ten million times) they could have chosen an actual actor to play her. All Kristen Stewart can do is cry and look mad.

    • Koki Kariya says:

      I would assume that they bought the bottles from a catalog of a company overseas and never bothered ask if they would be exclusive. Of course, they could have copied it entirely but who would be stupid enough knowing Nina Ricci would sue (and no doubt win).

      • Freckles says:

        They did it cuz it goes with the whole book-cover-forbidden-fruit theme of the Twilight book. Which makes no sense because the purfume is for the movie and the whole apple thing is not at all a part of that.

        • Roxy says:

          No, they added this part where Edward was holding the apple. And btw, I don’t hate or LOVE Twilight, I think it’s alright. But they totally ripped off that perfume bottle.

      • Ashley McMillian says:

        They did copy it. Nina Ricci is suing. And will no doubt win.

    • name says:

      god, i hate the smell of twilight fangirls, they smell like bat crap. Bleh. , i’ve smelled the Nina perfume, yum, not my favorite though.

    • crazyGirl says:

      I’ve been a twilight fan for three years now and I’m now underground kinda cause of all the wacko fans out there that pretty much scare me….
      i thought it was a good book.
      I like funny, weird, fantasy, but i read it and went on with my life.
      Situation’s getting out of hand.
      soo it probably smells like crazy. lol

      • Zoop says:

        You are a dying breed, Socially Acceptable Fangirl. Elsewhere we have nutjobs who’ve claimed to have slapped people for disliking the books. Yeesh.
        Live long and prosper.

  4. OPIE says:

    Without the different labels in the background, I would have thought they were two pictures of the same bottle!!

    • WarDragon says:

      lol, you don’t see the difference in colour? XD

      • OPIE says:

        Lighting can attribute to subtle color differences, and as I hinted above, once I noticed the different labels, the reason for the color differences became clear. The point I was shooting at is they are very close to matching.:)

    • Kit says:

      Yeah except that the nina ricci one is prettier, and the twilight one looks like a cheap knockoff.

  5. Kelly says:

    okay… even as a huge twilight fan i have to say WHY THE **** DOES TWILIGHT HAVE A PERFUME?!?!

  6. Fizz says:

    Does the Twilight one smell like freesia?

  7. boaks says:

    …this is too far. Even Harry Potter didn’t make perfume that I’m aware of. And now I’m dangling my prepositions. THIS MADNESS MUST BE STOPPED!

    • SKW says:

      In all fairness, Twilight appeals to only the female half of the Harry Potter fanbase. Bella’s only attractive to vampires because apparently she smells tasty. Of all the stupid things they could have merchandised, this one makes at least a smidgen of sense. But still. Unique packaging fail.

      • SwantonDiva says:

        As a female Harry Potter fan, I must respectfully disagree. I thought the movie was pretty lame. The books…meh. I can stand them.

        • Kelly says:

          yeah, but they aren´t going to specifically target girls in merchandising with harry potter.

        • SKW says:

          I’m a female Harry Potter fan, too. You can’t deny that it’s the same target audience.

          • blargh says:

            Harry Potter is aimed at children, whether or not audiences outside the U.K. think that learning about death and other unhappy things is suitable for children. Twilight is aimed at a teenage-girl/woman who wants to feel like a teenage girl audience.

          • Aoife says:

            As a female Harry Potter fan, yes I CAN deny it’s the same target audience.

          • Yali says:

            Uh, yeah. You couldn’t pay me to read Twilight at this point, and I would have Snape’s babies.

            • Freckles says:

              Are you refusing the book because of the suckish movie? Like they say, don’t judge a book by its movie. I am a twilight fan, but you can’t deny, HP dominates.

              • Annie Crimefighter's Subconscious says:

                I read the book. All four. And Midnight Sun [half online] and The Host. All six were awful. Harry Potter will always be better. And I CAN deny that it is the same target audience. Twilight is aimed at teenage girls, while HP was more aimed at the children-early teens.

      • Elissa says:

        Huge diff between Twilight and HP (quality being irrelevant to the thread):

        HP = adventure/mystery
        Twilight = Romance

        Thus, perfume is logical. Any romance in HP is as sub-sub-plots, and only mentioned in passing.

    • Slashydutchie says:

      I think they did make all sorts of bath and shower-stuff with a Harry Potter theme, actually. Not sure whether it included perfume, though.

      • ivorybyrd says:

        they made shower stuff usually for little kids, like they do with a lot of movies whose main target audience was younger teens and children, perfume i am not sure about unless it was a “bootlegged” creation from some no name company trying to get some bank from HP’s worth

    • Kit says:

      Well yeah, Harry Potter actually has a plot with things that would actually be INTERESTING in a video game. Can you picture a Twilight video game? It would be like, “Ten more points before Edward will agree to have sex with you!” That would be just a bit boring and stupid.

      • Kelly says:

        “Can you picture a Twilight video game?”

        hahahaha kiss edward as hard as you can without getting killed…. and instead of boss battles you get uber snuggles in the bed. whoever snuggles the hardest WINS!!!!

  8. chris says:

    i cringe at these comments as well as the “who cares” comparison.

  9. Lola says:

    Actually, it’s the other way around… the Twilight perfume looks like the Nina Ricci perfume. Did they really think no one would notice?

  10. Emily says:

    dats gotta b illegal somewheres

  11. moi says:

    sooo what’s next, a toaster that burns the character’s face onto the bread…..or would they go as far as to make twilight tampons?….crazy people

  12. RiderLeangle says:

    Where do you think Twilight got the bottles, Duh!

  13. mearrin69 says:

    Heh. Tampons for vampire-wannabes. [shivers]
    M

  14. vee says:

    the book was okay. the movie…kinda failed. robert was okay but the girlie who played Bella totally failed. and that’s ridiculous, they are exactly the same -_- complete fail. considering the box behind the bottle, it probably smells cheap as well.
    pfft, who wants to be attractive to vampires anyway? their personality sucked, they were only good for their looks. i mean, doesn’t that teach our kids kind of the wrong things? Not that i care, really, but yeah, def. the most failest originality evar.

    • timmis says:

      The entire Twilight franchise itself is just fail.
      This article disects the “morals” of the story: http://www.sodahead.com/question/205630/is-twilight-destroying-america/

      • Kelly says:

        that article was wrong in more ways than i can count… people need to read the book before they decide that it´s abusive or damaging. everything pointed out could easily be debunked by the context within the book. for instance, edward does not keep her away from her friends. she does that by herself. secondly, edward berates her for kissing him too hard because it could kill her.

        it is really frustrating when people berate something that they know nothing about.

        • Hello, computer says:

          sorry, don’t care enough to read the book. got sick and tired of the hype and having it shoved down my throat. twilight will not get a single penny of my money, the movies or the books.

          • Hello, computer says:

            or perfumes, or tampons, or whatever else they come up with. :P

          • emma says:

            If you had to you could always use a library…

          • Hailey says:

            Sorry, I gave up after the third book because the two male love interests are both creepy and abusive. Not to mention, Bella has no personality at all. She’s a blank template of submission for girls to cast themselves on, and it’s wrong. Perhaps when you kids grow up and realize that it isn’t cool for boys to tell you what to do, you’ll see it too.

            • Freckles says:

              I have had enough of chicks with no personality. Bella from Twilight, Olivia from Finge, DeAnna from The Bachelorette.

        • Cassie says:

          Defend that crap all you want, it glorifies and romanticizes an obsessive, unhealthy relationship. It’s completely misogynistic.

          • katie says:

            it really, really is.

            edward cullen is CREEPY. he’s a peeping tom, completely controlling and manipulative. and there are mother’s out there who say he is the perfect boyfriend for their daughters’.

            yuck.

            and the fourth book is even worse. the stupid girl is DYING and she won’t have an abortion. talk about horrible messages.

            • katie says:

              and i read all four books.

              bella also decides to give up college, and her entire family, for a guy she’s known as a teenager for about 6 months. it’s ridiculous.

              i’m all for compromises for love, but that series is ridiculous.

              • Kelly says:

                obviously you haven´t read them. she knew him longer than six months (at least over a year), he is not a peeping tom (he watches over her) , he is not controlling nor manipulative( she disobeys him all the time). he IS the perfect boyfriend, the kind that looks after their girlfriends and doesn´t use them for their own selfish sexual needs. if i have a daughter, i hope to God she gets boyfriend like that.

                you should read the draft of the book in edward´s pov and you´ll realize that he is totally innocent and selfless.

                • monnanon says:

                  Im sorry but if someone was “watching over me” i would be a creeped
                  out.

                  “Hes not controlling or manipulative(she disoboyes him all the time)”

                  Disobeys him!!!! you cant disobey someone unless they have a level of control of you. No i have never read the book but the language you used in the bit i have highlighted made me think a little.

                  Like all books the fans will never see the bad side and those of us who dont like them will be all too ready to jump on the bad things.

                  • Kelly says:

                    how exactly does disobeying him imply that he has control over her? you´re just messing with semantics now. he definitely has no control over her. she does whatever the hell she wants no matter how stupid, but edward is in no way shape or form manipulative. if you read the book, you´d know what i was talking about. in the context of the story, his behavior makes perfect sense, it just wouldn´t in the real world.

          • Kelly says:

            no… it does not. read the damn thing.

        • o-range says:

          I believe that the points that she isolated herself (for Edward’s sake) and that she forced herself to suppress her own needs and desires (for Edward’s sake) are exactly why the relationship is abusive. He doesn’t have to hit her to control her; her fear of being without him keeps her doing exactly what she needs to do just to keep him.

          The same behaviour exists in reality, in emotionally and physically abusive relationships.

          As was mentioned before I got here, it’s something that tweens in love with the books/mythology of having a supernatural boyfriend will realise when they grow up.

          • Kelly says:

            that´s her choice, not his. nothing abusive when she´s doing it to herself. he encourages her to hang out with her human friends. he even encourages her to stay human.

            it´s insane to me how people can interpret romance in this way and put the blame on the man like he made her do all these things. he did not!

            • Orangutan says:

              He also disabled her car so she couldn’t see her friends. And had her kidnapped. And broke into her house to watch her sleep. Wow, such romance!

              • Kelly says:

                he was right to disable her car. had her “kidnapped”, meaning he took her to his house so alice could watch over him, and he goes into her house to watch over her, he´s not just being a peeping tom.

                honestly, you have to look at context to get things right.

                • Orangutan says:

                  You, my dear, are deluded. It’s ‘right’ that he disabled her car because he didn’t want her seeing her friends? Why is that right? And I love how you’re justifying the breaking and entering. It does not matter what his intentions are, his behavior is CREEPY AS HELL. Can you honestly tell me that if you woke up in the middle of the night and found some guy you practically just met sitting there staring at you that you’d be flattered?

            • Emma says:

              I can tell you about abusive relationships! You reach a point where you know just being around him is damaging but you’ve grown so attached and dependent to him you can’t break free. You’re paralyzed and he’s become all you have to survive so it’d be easier to rip out your heart than to lose him. Even if he never lays a hand on her he’s obviously got an unhealthy hold on her mind.

              • Kelly says:

                that´s her fault, not his. he didn´t ask her to become so dependent on him that she can´t function without him. that´s not abusive.

                • Bloofer Lady says:

                  Ok, Kelly. I want you to take a step back from your computor, and take a deep breath. Then think about what you just typed.

                  You’re basically saying it’s Bella’s fault she’s being abused. Bella is the victim, and it is NEVER the victim’s fault.

            • what says:

              I’m sure people who’ve suffered abusive relationships can tell what’s happening, don’t you think?

              I’m so glad I’m not in that age range anymore…

              • Kelly says:

                if you think that protecting your woman means you are abusive here, you are blind. anyway, abuse happens to all ages.

                • LauraRiddle says:

                  Well, Kelly, you can go right on thinking that.
                  You can go on thinking that as some man tells you what you can and cannot do, isolates you from your friends and family, and convinces you that you cannot live without your man and that he’s only “protecting” you. Then one day, you’ll wake up and realize that you’ve become nothing but a tool. Better yet, you’ll realize that he’s taken everything precious from you and if you get away, you’ll always be looking over your shoulder to make sure he isn’t following.
                  Ah, but your man is cunning. He’ll realize that you’re slowly falling out of his control, so he’ll have to resort to more…drastic measures to make sure you don’t get away. He’ll probably watch your every move. He’ll demand for more sex, more attention. He’ll try to seduce you, but he’ll scare you when he says, “I’d rather shoot myself than live a minute without you”. But things can’t remain like this for long. He’ll grow more protective, and any wrong move you make, he’ll make sure your punished for it. How he punishes you all depends on his mood. He may scold you, he may hit you, he may even rape you.
                  Don’t worry about it, though. He’s just doing this because he loves you, because he wants to always be with you, because he doesn’t want anyone else talking, touching, even thinking of you.

                • Rose says:

                  Hey Kelly, your arguments are really getting nowhere, I keep reading the same thing over and over again…And honestly, you are convince me of nothing. We have read the books, how do you think we come up with such conclusions? Tell you what, I need you to go read some Dracula and some Anne Rice books, then come back and keep arguing with us.

  15. meg says:

    TOTALLY! fail! omg!

  16. anon says:

    i’ve seen twilight bandaids *facepalm*

  17. Cassie says:

    I just threw up a little in my mouth. Twilight must be stopped. Them ripping off a Nina Ricci bottle design is like that pic of Paris Hilton dressed as Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s. BLASPHEMY.

  18. Hailey says:

    So you can smell like shame and a well read book.

  19. misstressbabythegrim says:

    OMg! as if Flashlight wasn’t gay enough! and why didn’t NIna patent the bottle!!!????

  20. muffin says:

    i think they both look like tomatoes

  21. Rhapsodic says:

    Nina Ricci smells better.

  22. Kelly says:

    ahhhh the homophobia never ends, does it? heaven forbid vampires not be manly balls of sweat and testosterone

    • shivan says:

      why are you so god damn obsessed with defending this series? i’ve read the books, i understand your points .. but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. you don’t need to rebuke what they are saying after every comment.

  23. j says:

    yay for twilight tampons! like fishsticks for edward right?

  24. Reb says:

    Nina Ricci’s perfume came out before the Twilight version.

  25. Jbomb says:

    Twilight sucks!

  26. fAiLbLoGgEr says:

    Wow. A Twilight perfume? Nina Ricci is really nice, and Twilight is no match. Twilight perfume belongs on FAILBLOG, not Totally-Looks-Like.

    FAIL

  27. thatoneyoulovetohate says:

    you mean SJP’s looks like Nina Ricci’s. Let’s not get our firsts confused with the look alikes.

  28. Jennifer says:

    the resemblence is so uncanny that its hard to believe theyre not the same…

  29. Ally says:

    WTF?!?! A Twilight perfume?!?!

    …does it smell like sparkles?

    :)

  30. Mstar says:

    I love Twilight, but I will admit that that Summit screwed up here. I miss the days where no one had heard of it, that way when I recommend it, people wouldn’t think that I’m just some flaky fan girl.

    But, hello- Sarah Jessica Parker has nothing to do with Twilight. Major error there. And it doesn’t smell like sparkles. It smells like freesia, which is a reference to the book (which you would know if you read the book instead of basing your opinion of it upon a movie that wasn’t really all that great).

    To quote some t-shirt I saw: Movies, ruining the book sine 1929.

  31. Alex says:

    I’ve smelled this perfume (twilight) and DANGG it smells BAD!! It reminds me of s fabric softener sheet sprayed with Febreeze.
    And I totally agree with Mstar. Now whenever i talk about twilight people think that I’m just “one of them” when in reality, i was one of the first ones to read the series.
    i wish it was still more obscure.

    • Mstar says:

      Amen. I read and was a fan of Twilight back before it was a series.

      • Eleanor Rigby says:

        Exactly! I was one of the “original” fans, who loved the series before the huge hype blew out of proportion. Now I don’t even mention that I enjoy it.

        • Freckles says:

          Identicle? No wonder you hate people who read the book. You’re just jealous because you’re illiterate and they’re not.

  32. kerozene says:

    Who care’s that the bottle is a rip off? its still a damn ugly bottle design. Looks like some ugly retro strawberry thing that should be holding bubblebath and have the word “AVON” on the bottom.

    PS. Twilight fans are pathetic. I’m embarrased they’re a part of the human race.

    • Libby says:

      it’s shaped like an apple. Duh, the original Nina, by Nina Ricci has a sweet smell, as would an apple, which is probably why, other than the fact that it draws attention. Twilight is just stupid and totally copied the design on purpose hoping they would get away with it.

  33. Sheena says:

    hehe.

    to suck your blood?

    nice :D

  34. Brandi says:

    Anyway I just smelled that purfume the Twilight one and it stinks sooooo bad!!!

  35. Acid Enema says:

    They have a perfume for Twilight now?

    I have a fragrance now too. It’s called Publicity Stunt, and it’s on racks next month.

  36. Ariafaen says:

    actually, stephanie myere had nothing to do, with the Twilight perfume. she sold rights to Hot Topic, which owns Torrid. Hot Topic is infamous for stealing things for their products without crediting the original creator.

  37. Freckles says:

    Hahaha. Seriously, dis the series all you want, just know that Stephanie Meyer is rolling in her money and laughing along with you.

  38. Freckles says:

    Hahaha. Seriously, hate the series all you want, just know that Stephanie Meyer is rolling in her money and laughing along with you.

  39. Ripoff >__ says:

    OMG real ripoff!

  40. e says:

    i can’t believe that i read ALL of these comments right now. I can’t wait when the parfume is coming to the stores in my country (i guess never, nobody knows Estonia), i would just like to know does it smell as bad as you all say (:

  41. Mrs. Edward Cullen says:

    There is no “Sarah Jessica Parker Twilight” perfume. The Twilight perfume has Nothing to do with her.

  42. Mrs. Edward Cullen says:

    Oh and The Twilight Saga is actually just a series of good books. A very compelling story. I read them without any hype, out of sheer boredom, and fell in love with the characters.

    • Annie Crimefighter's Subconscious says:

      “The Twilight Saga is actually just a series of good books”
      Actually, they’re a series of FAIL books with no plot, flat characters, and sparkles.
      I read it out of hype. Hated it out of literacy.
      Besides, your name is “Mrs. Edward Cullen”. That qualifies me to ask you politely to go die in a ditch. Edward Cullen is not real. You will never meet him, marry him, or have abusive vampire-sex with him. EVER.

  43. faeriella says:

    those are both the exact same thing.

  44. Tyler Durden says:

    Twilight is gay!

  45. John D'oh! says:

    marketing fail!

  46. Randi says:

    This is NOT Sarah Jessica Parker’s perfume Twilight, but the Twilight film licensed product perfume

  47. :) says:

    lol i hav both perfumes.. they even kind of smell the same… lol

  48. Allison says:

    They look alike because ninna designed both of then, duh!!!

  49. rawrz says:

    didnt nina riccis come out first considering twilight came out last year?

  50. ohsoinsistent says:

    i cannot BELIEVE someone would stoop so low to try and squeeze any more money out of twilight-freaks. (also appalled that some idiot decided to make this in the first place)

  51. Christine says:

    wow, im a twilight fan and all. but honestly what has this world come to? twilight perfume? LAME.

  52. cait says:

    oh wow, twilight perfume? thats saaaad

  53. Allan Morris says:

    thanks for great information, just bookmark and waiting your next posting ;)

  54. lubert hamptsy says:

    you mean, twilight perfume looks like the other one?

    then it would make more sense.

  55. Reena says:

    Twilight sucks.
    The Nina Ricci perfume came out first, so the Twilight one is obviously copied.
    The Nina Ricci one has been out for about 3 years now.

    Stephanie Meyer, burn in hell for making up that crap Twilight. Learn to write.

  56. WhiteLilies says:

    Whereas it is true Nina Ricci’s perfume came out first the truth is that Twilight is not the company marketing this perfume. The company that actually “ripped off” Nina is Hot Topic. Earlier this year they were given permission to distribute the perfume but it was Hot Topic who was behind complete ensembly and marketing.

    Get your facts straight people. And they did it because there are people out there willing to spend money, so nothing wrong with that.

  57. teee says:

    This is not SJP’s perfume. She didnt create the ‘Twilight Fragrance’. She has a perfume called Twilight, but its not this one. It has nothing to do with the Twilight Saga. Why would she be involved in any way in the first place? Her money maker is Sex and the City. Anywho, this is completly retarded. Nina’s perfume was first and probably smells WAY better then the Twilight one. Though I do love Twilight, Im dissapointed that they would copy a design and think they could get away with it.

  58. Taylore says:

    actually the twilight perfume smells like laundry. my friend bought it and i almost pissed my pants laughing when she said it made her smell like what bella smells like to edward.

  59. Kandehkitteh says:

    They should use Twilight perfume to cover up the bad smell in the toilet.
    In which it would stink even more.
    Because every thing affilated with or is a product of Twilight stinks.
    Except for the little candies.
    I like them.
    :)

  60. kabooki says:

    You have been hit by…A random comment! WHAM!

  61. pm says:

    Whoever did the caption on that perfume made a mistake. Sarah Jessica Parker does have a perfume named “Twilight”, but it is not this particular perfume that was released in association with the Twilight movie. It is a different scent entirely and in a different packaging. This perfume is mainly a collectors item for the shape of the bottle and packaging more than a useful perfume for what it smells like (IMHO).


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Funny Faces Daily


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Tagged Look-Alikes

  • Recent Comments

    Bleh. on George Lucas Totally Looks Lik…
    Bleh. on Floaty things from Avatar Tota…
    LightCarrier on Half Eaten Pretzel Totally Loo…
    Evertide on Snow Covered Honda Fit Totally…
    Sqwirk on Two Monkeys Totally Look Like …
    SKW on Half Eaten Pretzel Totally Loo…
    Andrew on My Garage Door Emergency Relea…
    Andrew on This Baby Totally Looks Like W…
    Andrew on Freddy Krueger Totally Looks L…
    ephercat on Two Monkeys Totally Look Like …
  • Older Look-Alikes

  • Your Fave Look A-likes

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz