Comments on: Washington Nationals Hat Totally Looks Like Walgreens logo

By: Dumbass police

Dumbass police — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:50:49 +0000

You’re under arrest for impersonating an officer.

It’s Quentin Tarantino.

By: Dumbass police

Dumbass police — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:07:21 +0000

Hey, illiterate: it’s “you’re” not “your”. And check your spelling on “bastard”. You’re not Quintin Tarantino. Dumbass.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:20:44 +0000

No, I’m pretty sure the Senators had the curly W during the 20s or 30s. But I can’t be sure.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:18:58 +0000

Amen to that, Chris.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:17:34 +0000

And the Nats (Nationals’ nickname) are the worst team in baseball, that’s probably why you haven’t heard of them

By: Anthony

Anthony — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:16:26 +0000

It’s the FONT of the Nationals’ cap and the Walgreen’s logo. That’s why people think it’s funny. I personally don’t, I find the Nationals’ quality of play funny. They’re the worst team in the majors and had 102 losses last season.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:13:02 +0000

Walgreen’s must think the the Nationals are advertising their store. Why else wouldn’t they sue?

By: Miriam

Miriam — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:55:51 +0000

You know, the fonts aren’t that similar either! It’s just a cursive letter W on a red background people! This isn’t even elementary- this is preschool, people! Are people really surprised that two companies chose a cursive letter on a primary colour background?

By: Kelsey

Kelsey — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:28:19 +0000

Haha, yeah. I actually didn’t know the Washington Nationals hat meant ‘Washington Nationals’ for years.
I just always thought everyone was going around wearing Walgreen’s hats. I was always like, “Oooh, Walgreen’s. You’re cool.”
xD

By: CS

CS — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:50:05 +0000

Maybe Walgreens offers the Nationals free performance enhancing drugs if they wear the W. There are zillions of different ways you can do a W. Those look close enough to merit a lawsuit.

By: KBME

KBME — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:54:08 +0000

a duh! It’s the FONT that is what’s being compared not the object itself. Jeezus!

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:47:08 +0000

Walgreens has been using that “W” font since 1901. The Senators didn’t adopt that font until the 60’s.

By: great

great — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:57:17 +0000

lmao *thumbs up*

By: BS

BS — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:15:46 +0000

Okay, the Senators used the same “W” logo, so I’m pretty sure that Walgreens would be the one accused of stealing if the accusation is to be made. Not that it would since the logo is just a letter in a common font.

By: personjfreak

personjfreak — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:23:53 +0000

I’m wearing that hat right now.

By: anotherworldcitizen

anotherworldcitizen — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:43:44 +0000

I smell corporate sponsorship! Walgreen’s National Stadium here we come!

By: Chris Thomas

Chris Thomas — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:03:50 +0000

Go Nats!

By: bamboozled

bamboozled — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:48:19 +0000

And yet.. even though he doesn’t think that anything is funny, he continues to read the site and post comments.

Now THAT’S funny.

By: BBB

BBB — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:03 +0000

Yes, I am. Contrary to popular belief, 2 does not equal 3.

By: slythwolf

slythwolf — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:45:57 +0000

My response to everything posted on this site. Seriously.

By: soxfan

soxfan — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:37:12 +0000

They’re a Major League Baseball team, based in Washington, D.C. or thereabouts.

By: SKW

SKW — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:42:45 +0000

The point is that’s a specifically stylized W, with only the starting serif varying a little. With all the ways to make a W, they chose extremely similar ones. The fact that they’re both on red fields due to company colors doesn’t help.

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:34:24 +0000

Little aggressive on that opinion don’t ya think. But I do agree that it is a pretty stupid look alike. But to be shot for liking it, honestly, that’s just crazy.

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:32:49 +0000

Wow, aren’t you math wizzy?

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:31:59 +0000

To Ben I mean. Not sure what YOU are talking about anonymous.

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:31:17 +0000

I TOTALLY agree.

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:30:22 +0000

I mean MANY logo have a red background. That was a typo.

By: Blue

Blue — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:29:35 +0000

Thats a DUM DUM DUM DUM DOUBLE DUM look alike. Many people sign there W’s the same way. And my logos have a red background DUH.

By: RiderLeangle

RiderLeangle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:35:05 +0000

A W on a red background looks like a W on a red background? BLASPHEMY!!!

By: Madi

Madi — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:14:42 +0000

I added as a favorite because it is a great effort. The font is VERY similar. And who are the Washington Nationals?

By: ...

... — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:56:25 +0000

leave utube bithc

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:09:54 +0000

Are you serious?? A ‘w’ looks like another ‘w’???
This has changed my outlook on life permanently.

By: BBB

BBB — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:57:45 +0000

Agreed. A “hat” is a 3-dimensional object. A “logo” is 2-dimensional. In this case, they do not look similar.

By: ...

... — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:10:32 +0000

If you found that funny, your a sick and evil basterd and should be shot!

By: ...

... — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:10:01 +0000

Omg…how is this funny?

By: Jam-master P

Jam-master P — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:03:04 +0000

The FONT on the items, yes. The items themselves? Not so much.