Create Your Look-Alikes: Combine two photos (the well-known and the look-alike) on our Look-Alike Builder. You can compare anything, from celebs to animals and objects.
« Previous Iain Dowie Totally Looks Like Sloth | Earl Pickles Totally Looks Like Wilford Brimley Next »
The scary girl on this DVD cover Totally Looks Like the scary girl on
this DVD cover
ยป Think you can do better? Make your own!
Pictures by: Ghosts of Goldfield, The Sick and the Dead. Look-Alike by: doctor_76@hotmail.com via Totally Looks Like Builder
 | Stephen on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
| Stephen on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
 | Yvonne on Abraham Lincoln Totally Looks … |
 | Sofie on The Crypt Keeper |
 | Murray on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
 | F on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
 | creepers on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
 | peepers on My Son With Nylon On His Face … |
 | SDmn on Polish book “Trupojad… |
 | freepers on Lady Gaga Totally Looks Like G… |
Cheezburger Network Blog
Shouldn’t they be using photos of..I dunno.. THE ACTUAL ACTORS that appear in the movie on the dvd covers instead stock photos?
Both look like HIM to me.
Surely you mean they both look like Avril Lavigne.
*snicker*
Shouldn’t you be out getting health insurance and spending less time on here?
“Atheist = Idiot”
Nice name, sounds like you know what you’re talking about.
Indeed, someone who can’t spell the word “Atheist” must be smarter than one.
Lookie there! I have a sock! Or a stalker?
DSYLEXICS UNTIE!
Perhaps he is both an atheist and an idiot, thus proving his point?
yeah…because I’m sure NONE of you EVER misspelled a word before…must be awesome to be perfect…
yup i agree.
atheist = idiot
this is an assignment a comparison would be like this:
atheist == idiot
It depends on the language. Good luck using == on SQL.
Atheists or not, everyone is an idiot at some point of his life.
Damn, I was coming here to post that.
I can’t believe one stock photographer copied the exact setup as another stock photographer! They even used the exact same model.
It’s not the same set up with two different photographers, it IS the same photo. Just look at the way the hair falls, there’s no way they could duplicate that exactly.
Why are people so lazy? they just steal another person’s photography? wtf?
Oh
Em
GEE
what a rube
Are you so lazy you couldn’t read the titles to find out what movie they are? Or was “The scary girl on this DVD” Easier to write than Sick Dead and Ghosts of Goldfield
Haha, aw, I kind of like that they labeled it the way they did.
Seems appropriate somehow.
You know, gloworm, your comment would actually have some more merit if you didn’t get one of the titles wrong yourself.
*I meant RiderLeangle, sorry for that
Perhaps you were so lazy yourself as to be incapable of reading that the title is “The Sick and the Dead”, as opposed to “Sick Dead”, which makes no sense anyway.
That is so racist. On behalf of the undead worldwide, I demand a public apology.
STFU and eat my lead, zombie!
Wtf Queen of the world… seriously…?
will you ever just SHUT UP!?!?!?!?!?
You’re an idot QotW, gtfo the interwebs
My first thoughts on seeing the title of that first movie (since the middle two words are hard to see at first): “Sick of the Dead” As in, “After all the damn zombie movies lately, I’m Sick of the Dead.
And yet, they’re better than the latest vampire movies.
*shot*
Ah, there is the mandatory twilight reference. Cant a day go by that someone “cool” isnt bashing sparkle vamps
What gets me is they have ghost movies out where the ghosts look like zombies now. O.o wtf?
I think Roddy Piper as a headliner on the DVD jacket is a lot scarier than either of the “scary chix”
Hey! I saw Roddy Piper in “They Live”, and that had to be WAY worse than either of these movies. I’m just sayin’.
Did you know the “cripple fight” from South park was modeled move-for-move from one of Roddy’s fight scenes in that movie? Matt (maybe Trey) told about that in an interview.
longest fight sequence ever made between just two people
so artful. cheers to hollywood
They look alike because it’s the same girl duhh.
One just photoshopped the girl, that’s all.
They’re in slightly different poses, I think maybe they’re slightly different shots from the same photo session. But still, creativity fail.
The picture was slightly tilted in one and the contrast was magnified. That’s the only difference.
Speaking about copyrights…
Stock photography-a-go-go!
The girls in the pictures are WAY different! The one to the right is obviously more green than the other one!!
Hello, “Photoshop.”
I know, right? I was also noticing that the girl on the right also has a shoulder showing too…
[They are the same girl though.. *sad*]
However only one of those movies is less fail than the other? Can you figure it out?
This tll is all fail
Both of them totally look like Ozzy Osbourne
Ghosts of Goldfield came out 2007. Sick and the Dead came out 2009…the girls hand was removed, and her teeth were removed and the tongue obviously cloned over to seem longer. Everything else is identical other than the contrast. Ghosts-fail for using stock images, Sick-fail for copying said image, or worse, editing the cover itself.
oh come on people they are the same pic look a lil closer b4 you post
that is the same girl er boiy er whatever its the same person tho i know it is its gotta b!
I smell a lawsuit…
Yeah ’cause it’s completely illegal to use the same stock photo as someone else! Sue! Sue! Sue!
That Suppose to be a girl?
if its the same photo, why are the bottom teeth showing on one and not the other?
yea, I’m not thinking they’ve got a very big budget for the latest Roddy Piper flick…..stock photo was prolly all they could afford.
just saying.
Way to go stock photography. Lame.
You know what? I commissioned a publicity poster for Sick and the Dead and neither model on the poster was in the movie either! Sick and the Dead is a very cool film and I recommend it. Goldfield has Roddy Piper. Nuff said. Buy Sick and the Dead and you’ll see the actors are a lot better looking than this model (though I’m sure he/she is a very nice person).
It’s the same picture just cropped differently. So the scary girls don’t look alike, they are, in fact, the same person.
Really, what about stock photo are you morons not getting?
Is the same movie with different names! -.-’
Someone owes someone else royalties
what i wonder is who is the original photo and who is the copy cat
2 words:Just weird.
SAME STOCK IMAGE PEOPLE